Columnist: Why John Smoltz may be the best baseball Hall of Fame story

By John A. Tures - Contributing columnist

By John A. Tures

Contributing columnist

When John Smoltz went before the Hall of Fame voters in his first bid for Cooperstown glory, he had no share of detractors. But as he did throughout his career, Smoltz battled past those who would cite biased statistics with an injury comeback story and selflessness that can inspire any athlete.

Early in his career, Smoltz was a workhorse. This is no “throw 5 2/3 innings, then race to the shower and let the bullpen handle the tough stuff” pitcher. He even led the league in games started twice, and in innings pitched two times, a necessity given the team often had a somewhat shaky bullpen and few consistent hitters. It was because the team needed him on their unprecedented postseason run from 1991 to 2005.

But all those hard throws took their toll, and Smoltz’s elbow was done, an injury that derailed so many promising careers for pitchers. He could have retired then, easily making the Atlanta Braves Hall of Fame and start spending that salary. But that wasn’t the John Smoltz way.

He came back after the ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, described by USA Today as “a surgical graft procedure in which the damaged ligament in the elbow is replaced by a tendon from elsewhere in the body. Since the late Dr. Frank Jobe pioneered the surgery on Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Tommy John in 1974, it has become commonplace.”

But it wasn’t commonplace for Hall of Fame pitchers. Smoltz was the first pitcher to get into Cooperstown after undergoing the procedure. And that’s not even the best part.

Anyone who knew Smoltz knew he was a starter, and wanted to be a starter. In addition to loving that role, he was a fixture as one of the best hitting pitchers to ever play baseball, winning several Silver Slugger awards.

But the Atlanta Braves had an even bigger need. The bullpen had fallen apart, when the notorious John Rocker had his embarrassing meltdown. Giving up his starter spot meant potentially giving up that Cooperstown career. He wouldn’t be able to get many wins — his specialty — or many strikeouts, which many voters require of any starter. Plus, he wouldn’t get any at-bats.

Selfish athletes would have said no, demanding a place in the rotation, or a trade. Any so many teams would have sought his services. But Smoltz reluctantly headed to the bullpen, where the team needed him.

I was among the 40,000 Atlanta fans in the stands later that year, watching Smoltz preserve the third of three wins against the Houston Astros, who had won five more games than the Braves and had the home field advantage. He went on to amass 154 more saves, a third place finish in the Cy Young voting, before the bullpen was fixed and he could return to the rotation, where the team needed him once again. And he led the league in starts, and wins, in 2006. He eclipsed the 200 win mark and the 3,000 strikeout mark as well before his career ended.

Pundits speculated Smoltz might eventually get in, but certainly not as a first ballot Hall of Famer. Detractors cited biased “JAWS” and “WAR” statistics, knocked by experts like Bill James, for only rewarding starters. Sadly, there will be years of Smoltz being on lists of “doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame,” where you’ll find class players who earned their spot in Cooperstown like Ozzie Smith, Phil Rizzuto and Bill Mazeroski, each knocked for not hitting enough home runs.

The most amazing argument given claimed that any others who fell short — Curt Schilling, Mike Mussina, etc. — would have done just as well as Smoltz if they had gone to the bullpen too. It’s like claiming Lee Smith and Jeff Reardon belong in the Hall of Fame because they probably would have been good starters if they hadn’t been in the bullpen. And you can actually compare Smoltz’s relief statistics to Schilling’s time in the bullpen, if you’d like. It’s no contest.

As for the current inductees, even with the years in the bullpen and injury, Smoltz only has six fewer wins than Pedro Martinez, and won twice as many postseason games as Randy Johnson — and has nine more postseason wins than Martinez — with a lower postseason earned run average (ERA) than either. Both are deserved first ballot Hall of Famers. So is Smoltz.

But Smoltz is more than a collection of wins, saves, low ERA, postseason success, champion and Cy Young winner. He’s an inspiration to all of us who are injured in sports, and have to put personal glory and dreams aside for what’s best for the team. And that’s better than any number.

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College. He may be reached at [email protected]

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College. He may be reached at [email protected]

comments powered by Disqus