Fatcow Icon
Follow the money
Jun 08, 2012 | 2298 views | 8 8 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Dear Editor,

I, along with many others, waged a battle against the new SPLOST TAXES back in Nov. of 2011. The vote was close in Troup County, passing by only 179 votes. The majority of voters in District 3, voted not to tax themselves. I am the only candidate running for Commissioner in District 3 who opposed, as did the voters, the higher sales taxes, which are now in place for another 6 years because of the county wide referendum. It seems the people decided in District 3 they were Tea’d (Taxed Enough Already) but for 179 votes county wide , the sales tax in Troup County would be 5 percent beginning in 2013.

The voters now face an additional 1 percent for 10 years, the T-SPLOST, to add to the present 7 percent sales tax if the voters vote again to tax themselves.

The following will appear on your primary ballot July 31st.

“Shall Troup County’s transportation system and the transportation network in this region and the state be improved by providing for a 1 per cent Special District Transportation Sales and Use Tax for the purpose of transportation projects and programs for a period of ten years?” Yes or No? There is deception in the question.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Georgia lawmakers avoid responsibility by claiming that they are allowing the voters to “choose” a tax that they vote to allow on a ballot and claim it is our choice. All the while they claim it’s for the “public good”. If they really believe that why didn’t they vote the tax increase themselves as was in the original bill? The bottom line is that politicians are abusing the referendum process to force an additional tax on our backs for they fear to take responsibility for the bad legislation and they also know the ballot language will fool some.

T-Splost use of regional commissions is an attempt to add an unelected layer of government, destroying accountability, local control and representative government. Funneling billions of dollars through these appointed commissions, the using of appointed “citizens” review panels to monitor them is like the fox guarding the hen houses. They have created a mechanism whereby people in other counties can extract money from unwilling voters in other counties. If 50 percent plus 1 votes to tax themselves July 31st in this 10 county region and all in Troup County vote no, too bad we in Troup County will be taxed. Let’s pray that 50 percent plus one votes” no” in Coweta, Heard, Butts, Pike, Carroll, Meriwether, Spalding, Upson ,Lamar , along with Troup County .

Why would special interest groups fund an $8,000,000 propaganda campaign to misdirect voters? They are supported by bureaucrats whose power can expand. The T-SPLOST is not about transportation projects, but about eliminating local control, enriching some at our expense. Someone has called this tax “T-SLOP” FOR THE PUBLIC TROUGH!

I am against the T-Splost and suggest the voters in District 3 not be fooled by those candidates who have now voiced opposition against this 10 year tax when they whole hearted wanted you to tax yourselves for 6 more years back in November. Liberals have never met a tax they didn’t like. I think they know the voters have caught on, at least in District 3.

Ellen Gilmore

Candidate for Troup County Commissioner District 3



Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
heartland
|
June 14, 2012
Ms Gilmore, I challenge you to name two local leaders who have voiced their support of the T-Splost ! Leaders are condemne d if they vote yes or no for a splost ! Do you have other issues that you are concerned about . How do you feel about industrial recruitment in our county. How important do you think it was for Troup County to bring 8000 jobs to Troup County with Kia. Would you support grants to enlarge the senior center? Madman1
letsmoveforward
|
June 13, 2012
You really don't get it, do you? The SPLOST we passed in Nov and the T-SPLOST are two different issues. So it isn't baffling that somone would agree on one and not the other, they aren't changing their minds about anything!!

SPLOST passed and you need to GET OVER IT.
heartland
|
June 09, 2012
As you stated, T-splost is regional. Our local splost is controlled by local government. The people spoke and have approved 4 in a row. You might to find another tree to bark up since you don't seem to speak for the majority. Madman1
L.E.O.
|
June 09, 2012
Ellen you make it sound like you think you were on the "right side" of the local SPLOST vote back in November and you use inflamatory language to insinuste that those who supported the local SPLOST were/are "liberals" and that you are the only current district 3 candidate that is a true conservative. The obvious facts that you overlook are the public safety ramifications that not voting for the local SPLOST would have had. In an economy where funding for public safety programs have been cut by nearly fifty percent in five years this tax was absolutely necessary to ensure local public safety workers have needed equipment to properly care for the citizenry. No doubt some fluff was added in for recreation, but the public safety aspect alone was enough to vote for it. To make it sound as if it were a close vote is outrageous given the dismal voter turnout. The other sixty /- percent that didn't vote in essence voted for the SPLOST throuh apathy. That is not a close vote for your stance. Additionly, T-SPLOST is a different matter all together. None of the current district 3 candidates support T-SPLOST. That means they also see the insanity in a regional tax with no local oversight. In conclusion, I will remind the local citizens that there is conservative and then there is extreme right wing conservative...... the last time the world saw extreme right wing conservative government we got the holocaust. Mrs. Gilmore where do you fall on the spectrum?
ConcernedGranger
|
June 14, 2012
Even though I have no interest in voting for Ms. Gilmore, mainly because of the conflict of interest her and her husband clearly have, I agree with her comments as to the SPLOST and T-SPLOST.

Although seperate, both are under the auspice and advancement of fear mongering. Case and point is L.E.O.s' comments that saftey would have gone by the way-side if the SPLOST would not have happened, no it would not have. Yes, some taxes are needed to do the business of the county and city. However, I have a real problem when you float out the idea that teacher's jobs would be spared and local projects will go undone if not passed...by the way... after the vote the truth has come out and we were lied to. Moreover, I am all but certain that local leaders knew that the T-SPLOST would be on the ballot come summer and still blitz kreiged ahead nonetheless. We are not as dumb as you think we are. But, like the old saying goes, "fool me once shame on you." Fool me twice, shame on me."

To echo Ms. Gilmore vote no in the upcoming election. Remember, it is SUPPOSED to be the government of the people for the people.....
abney
|
June 15, 2012
Amazing, someone provides objective information on the subject of taxes for people to accept or reject as they choose and the personal attacks continue. The facts are, the voters who cared enough to vote in District 3, voted against taxing themselves last November. The writer of the article on the T-Splost did not say she was the "only conservative". She said she was the only candidate for commissioner in District 3 who agreed with the voters in District 3. "Liberals" when losing an argument resort to personal, name calling attacks. L.E.O is an example. It's still a voter's choice. If the voters in District 3 want more and higher taxes, bigger and more intrusive government, then the vote July 31st will be their chance to approve it. The choice is clear.
L.E.O.
|
June 15, 2012
ConcernedGranger, you obviously misread my comment. I, like many others, are firmly against T-SPLOST. There was no lie regarding our local SPLOST. You are correct that public safety will continue to be taken care of, but without local SPLOST it would have been hampered. Without these funds new technologies that keep public safety workers safe could not have been purchased. You are uninformed, but not the receiver of a lie. I assert that your statements are akin to conspiracy theories.
AngryPatriot13
|
June 16, 2012
"I will remind the local citizens that there is conservative and then there is extreme right wing conservative...... the last time the world saw extreme right wing conservative government we got the holocaust. Mrs. Gilmore where do you fall on the spectrum?"

Really now? The holocaust? You do know that Germany (assuming that is what you are referring to) had a government-controlled education system, central economic planning ran rampant, and civil liberties were pretty much compromised to high degrees. That doesn't sound the least bit Conservative/Libertarian. In fact, government trends were more Left wing if anything. Even though Hitler believed the Nazi Germans to be God's "master race," it was hardly classified as pro-limited government and pro-civil liberties as the Conservative/Libertarian ideals imply.

In terms of the T-SPLOST issue, I ask this: Why should we be putting this on the tax payer's tab when our own state government has plenty of waste to cut in spending? That money wasted on pet projects could very well go towards mass transit. I'm pretty sure our state government would survive if it couldn't blow money on a stadium.

Another thing to address is with the SPLOST. I was looking at the Troup County budget and saw the Fiscal Year 2013 Budget proposal. Without the SPLOST for our local area, we still have a budget surplus of almost $1 million. That money could very well translate into public safety spending instead of raising taxes. I'm not too sure how the entire Lagrange city budget unfolds, but I'm pretty sure the city is doing pretty well enough to consolidate funds for things that need it most.

I'm really surprised that people are so fine with supporting measures that call for additional taxation upon themselves. Especially when the economy is weak and we are being taxed in various other ways (including inflation of the US dollar).

I respect your opinion, L.E.O., but to insinuate the undertones of Nazism with Conservatism, especially when Nazism was a Left wing concept, is totally unfounded.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: