Fatcow Icon
Our View: We regret cartoon’s negative reaction
Aug 10, 2012 | 2872 views | 4 4 comments | 37 37 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Last Saturday we ran a syndicated cartoon on the Editorial page of the LaGrange Daily News suggesting that the Chick-fil-A restaurant chain was selective about which passages of the Bible they followed. The cartoon came after Chick-fil-A President and COO Dan Cathy said in an interview with The Baptist Press he was supportive of the family-the Biblical definition of the family unit. His comments created a backlash in the gay and lesbian community by those who interpreted his views as being against same-sex marriage.

Many who agreed with Cathy’s views showed up for an unofficial Chick-fil-A appreciation day on Aug. 1 at stores across the country, including the two locations in LaGrange. Predictably, supporters of same-sex marriage organized their own nationwide event to draw attention to their cause.

The cartoon created a backlash of its own, inspiring a local minister to announce to his congregation that he was cancelling his subscription to the LaGrange Daily News. Several subscribers called to cancel their subscriptions this week, citing the publication of the cartoon as the reason.

Those who have come to the conclusion that the editorial staff of the newspaper is biased against the Chick-fil-A chain only need to read the newspaper to see how wrong that assumption is. We have carried many stories about the company’s charitable contributions and community outreach programs. A recent feature in our July 30 Progress edition noted that local fundraisers and contributions enabled 241 children to attend WinShape Camp, which was started by the fast-food chain. The local camp is made possible through local sponsorships, as well as a partnership between the two local stores, and four area Baptist churches including Western Heights Baptist Church, Baptist Tabernacle, New Community Church and First Baptist Church on the Square.

We regret that the publication of this cartoon created such a negative reaction among some of our readers. Most people understand that the editorial page of a good local newspaper is reserved for various points of view. We don’t have to agree with all of them and chances are we don’t. But editorials, letters, columns and even cartoons, representing various points of view, make for a good community discussion.

We believe there’s something for everybody in a local newspaper. The news and editorial pages are a reflection of the community itself – diverse, unpredictable, at times tumultuous, but always unique. We hope you agree that is what you will find in the pages of the LaGrange Daily News.



Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Fredsaid
|
August 17, 2012
Just goes to show that LDNs own freedom of speech can be negated by threats of fringe groups to cancel their paper subscriptions.That's blackmail anywhere else, but LDN apologizes! So from now forward any opinion or editorial cartoon must meet strict standards of not offending anyone at all.Which in essence means LDN apologized to keep their almighty subscription dollars coming in.. That's integrity for you.
wordpower
|
August 16, 2012
I'm glad the paper didn't "actually apologize" for running the cartoon. I'd be disappointed if they did. And I am really disappointed in those citizens who would up and unsubscribe to the LDN because it dared to print a professional editorial cartoon that rubbed them the wrong way, and especially if they just blindly followed their religious leaders. That feels almost cultish to me. I hope the LDN is also gaining readers because they have decided to be bold and probing instead of politically correct.
ColonelJack
|
August 10, 2012
I notice in this almost-a-mea-culpa that the Editorial staff doesn't actually apologize for publishing the cartoon ... just for the negative reaction its publication created. I'm just saying ...
Valdamara
|
August 13, 2012
It's an editorial page for a reason. It allows various views to be shared without complaint but is almost separate from the rest of the newspaper. Any view is up for grabs — look at half of the editorials that are printed and you will see that it is supposed to act as a soapbox for anyone and everyone.

The last thing they have to do is apologize for running a cartoon on the editorial page. You're assumption that they should apologize defeats the purpose of the editorial page. You don't apologize for your opinion, anymore than they expect you to apologize for your opinion of their reaction.

Canceling a subscription over an editorial page cartoon printed by thousands of newspapers across the country is the most asinine thing anyone could do. Baxter should be ashamed for letting "Big Top" Murphy do an entire article on how he decided to cancel his subscription — like the newspaper has never failed to do whatever it could for that church. Talk about Christian.

Reading comprehension obviously isn't your strong point. I'm just saying.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: