Fatcow Icon
What’s wrong with Romney?
Sep 14, 2012 | 3302 views | 5 5 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print

As I have previously written, I believe Mitt Romney will win in November because

of the terrible economy. However, Romney should be leading President Obama by twenty points. What’s wrong with Romney?

For starters, Mitt Romney is one of the most inconsistent politicians I have ever seen. To say he is a flip-flopper is an understatement.

This past week he has been talking about what he has in common with Obama’s health care program. I thought he was vehemently against the president’s health plan.

When it comes to deficit spending, taxes, gay rights, and abortion, he has been all over the board. At times I honestly don’t think he truly knows what he believes.

The Republicans, in my opinion, chose the wrong candidate. They should have put Congressman Paul Ryan at the top of the ticket. At least Ryan has some consistency to his candidacy.

One thing I liked so much about Ronald Regan was his consistency. I never had any doubts about Reagan’s core values. The question is does Romney have political convictions he is willing to fight for?

Another Romney problem is that Americans in general cannot, on a personal level, relate to a man who makes $30 million a year. When Romney portrays himself as just one of the guys, he has absolutely no credibility.

As I have stated, I like rich people. During my thirty-three years in the United Methodist ministry, some of my best members were very wealthy. In fact, I got along better with them than I did with the middle class. I have no problem whatever with Romney’s money. I applaud the fact that he has prospered monetarily.

Again, however, he does not connect with the middle class. My cousin who lives in Atlanta is voting against Romney for that reason. He is not voting for Obama. He is voting against Romney.

If the Republicans cannot beat Obama, a weak candidate, then how will they beat a strong candidate like Hillary Clinton in 2016? Again, Romney should win in a landslide over Obama.

Romney’s religion will hurt him with some evangelicals. Being an evangelical Christian, I believe we are saved by the grace of God. Works will not save us. Mormons believe in works righteousness- pure and simple. No true evangelical can accept this.

Larry Summerour of Troup County is a retired pastor who enjoys political commentary



Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
justme56
|
September 22, 2012
The reverend never responds to comments which means he can dish it out but can't take it. The business of being saved by faith alone is absurd. It's like telling your spouse or child that you love them but never show it as love is not just a matter of belief but of demonstration. Don't be a good person because of some religion but because it's right and easy. If you need religion to be good, you have some serious issues because being kind and honest all that should be natural.

The reverend will obviously vote for Romney but really hates the guy yet relates to him as well since he feels more comfortable with the super upper class. Too many contradictions.
justme56
|
September 19, 2012
Obviously, the reverend is what we call a "paper Christian" who doesn't really live his faith and this is why there's so much division, anger and hatred among the ranks. Now, of course we are seeing the true nature of Romney from his comments among those he feels the most comfortable with, the multi-zollionaires. The comments (by Romney) about just wanting to simply win the election shows his true nature and his quest for power and not helping the people. This blantant distain for the poor (which in his case is just about anyone outside the top 1%)and treatment of women should make anyone realize what a danger this man would be as president along with his "shoot first aim last" policies toward the Chinese and Arabs. It's not like he's going after the neighborhood bully. A monkey could figure out this man's true nature. The reverend is acting like the third party candidate in E. J. Hunter's book PEST CONTROL and this is frightening.
wordpower
|
September 17, 2012
It kind of bothers me that a minister would say he got along better with wealthy people than the middle class. I'd like to know more about where that statement comes from. Jesus surely didn't feel that way.

I'm also bothered by the assertion that no true evangelical "can accept" Mormons' emphasis on good works. Good Works Faith and Grace Faith are not mutually exclusive. Yes, St. Paul tells us that we are saved by faith, not by works. But James tells a different story - that faith without works is dead. And if you truly believe in salvation by grace, then in accepting that gift from God one should feel led to share their joy through good works. If no evangelicals can accept Romney's Mormonism, then I don't see how in the world he will win in a landslide, because a LOT of rabid Republicans come from just such an evangelical base.
msebenet
|
September 17, 2012
I totally disagree. Obama is NOT a week opponent. Just because a candidate wins the campaign and gets the title of President does not mean he can make the changes that he promised he would make. He has to have support. Republicans plotted from day one to make sure nothing he wanted to do would succeed. Instead of doing what they thought was good for the PEOPLE, a bunch of grown men got together and planned how they were going to play a game for 4 years to shoot down everything he tried to do. No President,whether he is Democrat, Replubican, etc. will ever be successful until these parties grow up and learn to work together for what's best for this country, rather than what's best for them. Obama is not weak, only the majority of the people behind him are.
Fredsaid
|
September 16, 2012
Reverend,

Your rambling endorsement (?) of Romney is, to say the least, humorous, although, I’m sure you that wasn’t your intention. but saying ” he’s inconsistent, he does not connect with the middle class,

a flip-flopper, is all over the board ,the wrong candidate with questionable political convictions “ and saying” he can‘t be related to on a personal level,” all terms you use, NOT against his opponent,(President Obama) but as a glowing(?) description of your own candidate(Romney)! Now, sorry, but you’ll have to admit it, that’s one heck of endorsement! (for reelecting President Obama).

You should give that voice inside your head that says “please, don’t write that” more serious consideration. I’m sure when you wrote ” the very wealthy ”were your “best members” in your past ministry. Saying “ In fact, I got along better with them (the very wealthy) than I did with the middle class.”! I try not to be a hypocrite, but it’s clear to me what common attribute ($$) comprised your” best members” in your mind, Reverend. The middle class members of your past ministry wouldn’t be too pleased if they read that confession.

Tell your cousin in Atlanta there isn’t a place on the ballot where you can vote “against” anyone. So, if he carries through with his logic, he’ll be voting for Obama. But, what the heck, I‘ve got some cousins who are voting for him too.



Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: